Aviation News Journal
  • News and Articles
    • Feature Articles
    • News
    • Airshows
    • Aviation Management
    • Airports
    • High Flyer Comics
    • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact

31/8/2020

“Delegation never works”

0 Comments

Read Now
 
This is the second of a series of articles which focus on managerial challenges in the aviation and aerospace industries. The following brief scenario / case study which is meant to illustrate the problems associated with succession planning, career development and a changing workforce. Part 1 will outline the problem Part 2 will discuss the issues and possible solutions.

Part 1 – The Scenario

Bob was beside himself, Marnie, the sales manager for the organization had just reminded Bob that a potential client’s auditing team would be on site next week.  This was part of a standard pre-qualification audit to determine if the company would be approved as a qualified vendor for an upcoming multimillion dollar RFP (Request for Proposal). The company was trying to secure the contract to supply the air transportation needs for an upcoming multibillion dollar resource project.

As the maintenance manager for the air carrier, Bob had delegated Suzanne, one of the crew chiefs to ensure that the facility would be ready for the inspection. But the reality was that the external audit could not be scheduled for a more inconvenient time. A heavy check was in progress on one aircraft and the company had recently started operating another aircraft type which was causing some unexpected challenges – diverting Suzanne’s attention during her shifts. Add to this, the fact that it was summer and a number of key personnel had taken vacation.

Bob was done – he wanted to throw his hands up in despair – he was busy enough managing the maintenance department, fulfilling his primary responsibility of keeping the aircraft in the air – Why was he now having to pander to the requests from the sales manager? As he looked around the facility he realized that Suzanne had not managed to make any progress on getting the hangar ready for the external audit. Well it looked like the family would have to take a back seat again – As usual, I will have to organize the job myself, and Bob muttered “delegation never works!” - As he stormed back to his office.
 
What would you do if you were in Bob’s shoes or in a senior management role?
​

When reviewing a scenario we ask a few questions like: who are the players? What are the primary / secondary issues here? What could happen? And what are the possible solutions to the problem? Take some time to write down some of the challenges and ideas for correcting the challenges.
Picture
Part 2 – Problem identification
​

When reviewing a scenario we ask a few questions like: who are the players? What are the primary / secondary issues here – root causes? What could happen? And what are the possible solutions to the problem? (Not unlike doing a corrective action plan)
 
 
Players; Bob – Maintenance Manager -primary subject. Suzanne – Crew chief, Marnie – Sales manager, The Company itself, the potential customer, and the management and employees of the company would be seen as the primary players.

What could possibly happen? What is at stake for the company and for the players?
At the macro level, all companies’ need to generate revenue in order to at least stand a chance of making a profit. An inability to secure work through a competitive bidding process puts everyone’s job at stake. At the personal level Bob’s reputation and reputation of the maintenance department is at stake from both internal and external customers. In a relatively tightly knit but highly competitive industry such as aviation, the reputation of the company and its employees is critical to its long term success.  What about Bob’s Personal wellbeing – if he continues to try to personally solve every challenge?

On the surface the issues /challenge here appears to be based around a few themes:
  1. Workload / Resource Management (Project Management) and,  
  2. Leadership / Management in regards to Bob’s perceived need to step forward and take control
  3. Organizational silos / perhaps this site visit is not seen as a priority by Bob
  4. A lack of an integrated quality culture?

The reality is that you probably have seen a situation like this occur or you have played one of the roles in this classic workplace challenge. We are often asked to do more with less, within a time constraint set by others. Companies exist in order to make a profit and have finite resources. (Trying not to sound too much like the master of the obvious here.)  WE know this, then why are these workplace challenges common – why does it seem like organizations go from one crisis to another?

Part 3 Building a Solution

We have reviewed the scenario, identified the players, what is at stake, and proposed a couple possible causes. Now what should Bob / or the leadership group do at this point / and in the long term to correct the current challenge?

Short term action

 n this particular scenario the timeline is relatively short – the external auditors will be here in the next week – at this point we have no choice but an immediate call to action. A sense of urgency needs to be communicated to the front line. In a situation like this where the stakes are this high, be truthful. Bob needs to let the team know what is at stake here.  If everyone understands that this inspection could lead to an important contract they will probably come together and get the work done. Don’t just tell people to do something – engage them – take the time to explain why this is important.
 
Longer term corrective action

Is it possible to build an organization that is able to withstand commercial pressures while thriving in an environment of constant change? There is a direct link between a resilient culture and a culture which supports a quality mandate. The connection is an engaged workforce.  But what does it mean to have an engaged workforce? For the purpose of this case engagement means a workforce which shows up physically, mentally, and emotionally. Meaning they actually are showing up for more than just a pay cheque.
​
Although not foolproof, the following suggestion may assist your organization and your people to be more resilient and engaged when the inevitable happens and projects collide.

  • Build organizations which support teams - Teams are much more resilient than individuals. How you organize and reward your work groups can contribute to the team effectiveness. Ask yourself are you rewarding individual effort or team effort. (The classic example being the commission sales person who is focused on one objective alone)
  • Build a culture which supports innovative thinking – listen to front line staff, reward ideas, celebrate new ideas, remember that innovation can sometimes involve taking a chance – not all ideas succeed – don’t dwell on failure
  • Every member of your organization needs to know what their role is in the organization and how their input can affect others – this helps break down barriers and silos within organizations – Silo’s detract from teamwork. 
  • Encourage initiative within your work groups but  beware of the lone ranger 
  • Model the behavior you want to see – managers need to work collaboratively
  • Set clear expectations  - Then hold individuals and groups accountable to agreed expectations
  • Remember motivated people and teams will achieve more – and more importantly - learn how intrinsic motivators work.
  • Set goals that are measurable and have an agreed completion time – then hold the group or the individual accountable ( a goal that is not measurable is not a goal it is an aspiration)
  • Celebrate the group successes
  • Trust your people
  • Say thanks – a lot

These are all great points but without buy in from the leadership team any initiatives will be doomed – The first step would probably be determining if Bob is willing to change his approach to management. Senior management will have to make a decision based on what they know about Bob. Perhaps the first step would be set up a mentoring program for Bob. Or alternately removing Bob.

Summary

In a rapidly changing world where market conditions and competition is constantly shifting, organizations need to be able to adapt. Managers need to sharpen their leadership skills. The traditional management role was seen as maintaining the “Status Quo” – this approach does not support a resilient organization that can rapidly adapt to changing market conditions nor support a quality focused culture.

Building the organizational culture that you desire or changing an existing organizational culture does not just happen. Management needs to be very deliberate and disciplined when developing the organization which meets the organizations objectives.

Remember: “Nature abhors a Vacuum” an organizational culture will form in any organization. If management is not deliberate, the organizations cultural vacuum will be filled with something – unfortunately it may not be the culture that supports your organizational objectives. 

​These articles may only be used for used for not-for-profit educational purposes.
Copyright © 2020.​
Picture

Share

0 Comments

30/8/2020

Setting a new manager up for success or failure?

0 Comments

Read Now
 
This is the first of a series of articles which focus on managerial challenges in the aviation and aerospace industries. The following brief scenario / case study which is meant to illustrate the problems associated with succession planning, career development and a changing workforce. Part 1 will outline the problem Part 2 will discuss the issues and possible solutions.

Part 1 – The Scenario

Peter was enjoying the evening, the whole QA department from Upward Aviation had gone out for dinner together to say goodbye to Terry, the QA manager who was leaving the company after 12 years of service. Terry’s spouse had recently been promoted to a senior leadership position in the federal civil service but it meant moving the family across the country to Ottawa. It was a tough decision to leave the company but for Terry, family comes first!

It was great to have the QA team together tonight, but Peter could not help but wonder – Was he ready to assume the role of QA Manager? Would he succeed or fail? The company was hoping for a smooth transition but the reality was that Terry’s departure was a complete surprise and the selection process had been streamlined to meet the tight timeline of getting someone into the QA position ASAP.

Terry had risen through the ranks initially starting as an AME with Upward Aviation when they only had 5 aircraft.  Over the next 12 years the company had grown to 20 aircraft and Terry had taken on a variety of roles with ever increasing responsibility until he was made QA manager 2 years ago. Unfortunately Peter had only been with the company for 18 months and although he was a highly experienced auditor he had never actually managed a team. As the evening went on Peter’s level of anxiety over the new responsibilities increased – what was he going to do?

What would you do if you were in Peter’s shoes or in a senior management role?
When reviewing a scenario we ask a few questions like: who are the players? What are the primary / secondary issues here? What could happen? And what are the possible solutions to the problem? Take some time to write down some of the challenges and ideas for correcting the challenges.
Picture

Part 2 – Problem Identification

When reviewing a scenario we ask a few questions like: who are the players? What are the primary / secondary issues here – root causes? What could happen? And what are the possible solutions to the problem? (Not unlike doing a corrective action plan)
Players; Terry – outgoing QA manager, Peter – Incoming QA manager, The Company itself including senior management and other employees, Transport Canada, Internal and external customers

What could possibly happen if Peter fails in this position?
​

The reality is a fully functioning QA department is critical to a modern aerospace entity. The results could be catastrophic for the organization, starting with the loss of reputation right through to the suspension of a licence by Transport Canada – this is a big deal!

On the surface the issues /challenge here appears to be twofold: retention and replacement but there is another issue around assisting Peter to be successful in this new position.

This scenario is not that uncommon, many of us have either witnessed or been part of a situation like this. The reality is people come and go all the time in organizations, Terry is no exception. One thing that may be different in today’s world may be the level of loyalty and devotion to the company.  Today’s workforce tends to be more focused on work life balance along with life experiences. Another consideration, in most families both partners are working. The traditional 1950’s family model is long gone. Although it is doubtful that there is anything specific that could have been done to persuade Terry to stay, as a manager what are some of the things you can do to enhance retention among your staff.
  • building a culture where all employees matter (this is a case study all in itself)
  • Each member of your team has a development plan in place
  • Ensure you have a clear set of objectives for your group and celebrate every success
  • As a manager be authentic! do what you say, and say what you do  
  • And remember, pay is only one reason why people work

If you develop a culture where people feel they are part of the team and they feel that their contributions matter, you will reduce but not eliminate turnover. So onto the other challenge - replacement.

Traditionally in many small to medium enterprises the process of employee replacement does not start until the employee announces their pending departure. This is not good enough and we need to do better. Here are some best practices that should be adopted to ensure that your organization is better prepared for employee turnover.
  • Have a current job description for every position within the organization – the description should include job duties and key attributes necessary to be successful in that position
  • Transparency in hiring and posting – linking hiring decisions back to the job description – this assists employees to know what they need to do to move forward in the organization ( helps retention)
  • Identify key positions and ensure that a succession plan is in place for each – this may include who else in the organization has the ability to assume the role in an interim basis (Very important for positions which require the regulators’ approval) A 30 day notice of suspension goes by very quickly
  • Every employee needs to have a development plan in place – these could be tied to positions within the company that the employee would like to aim for
  • Keep employee profiles updated – this helps you identify possible internal candidates
  • Ensure that you have a robust recruitment and selection policy which ensures that employees are selected with a balance of technical skills, and attributes that are in alignment with your company values

We just touched on some long term strategies for helping to build an organization which is more proactive around retention and replacement. A company with a strong Human resources strategy will be more resilient when the unexpected departure occurs. 

But, what do we do now that Peter is in a situation in which he feels unqualified for? 

In reviewing the case we see that Peter has strong technical skills but lacks experience in managing a team. Now what sometimes happens in a situation like this is the new manager without training tries to emulate the managers that he has experienced in the past. Well, if Peter has had experienced good management he may do fine, but alternately – you see where this is going. Leaving Peters’ management training up to chance is not an option. Managerial training should be consistent across an organization and for this reason HR is a good starting point when creating a development plan for a new manager.
A couple suggestions that could be considered in Peter’s case:
  • Identify a managerial mentor – preferably someone from within who understands your organizations unique culture.  Schedule regular mentoring session’s offsite otherwise work gets in the way – and if you don’t actually schedule the session they don’t actually happen.
  • Work with Peter to do a bit of a personal reflection and managerial gap analysis then build a plan which focuses on identifying the managerial skills that Peter needs to focus on first, second, etc.
  • Based on the exercise above have Peter research some managerial courses he could take – avoid the one day managerial course – look to courses from public institutions with a bit more rigour.
  • Sign up for some managerial podcasts such as Harvard idea casts or Manager tools
  • Read some management books by recognized management experts such as Henry Mintzberg, Michael Porter, or Dan Pink – and set some time aside to actually read and digest the information.
  • Ensure regular check-ins occur with the managerial mentor and with Peter’s direct supervisor –feedback is essential.
 
Summary
​

People are not usually born as good managers. Management is a skill or a craft, and as with any craft it takes practice and hard work to learn it well. A good manager is one whose main focus is on developing their team while meeting organizational goals in a positive manner. Preparing someone for a managerial position takes time and effort – if left to chance the outcomes can be disastrous. Our current workforce is aging rapidly, companies need to embrace strategic Human Resource policies which will provide for the recruitment and selection of solid candidates.
​
A quick analogy – Every essential system on a modern transport category aircraft has redundancy built in – ask yourself – What is my redundancy system for key positions in our company? ​

​These articles may only be used for used for not-for-profit educational purposes.

Copyright © 2020.
Picture

Share

0 Comments
Details

    Author

    These case study and analysis articles were written by Rod Hayward, an associate professor in the BBA AV (Bachelor of Business Administration in Aviation) programme at the University of the Fraser Valley. Rod has worked as a commercial pilot, AME M1 &2, QA manager, director of maintenance, entrepreneur and manager in the Canadian aviation industry and is currently the president of PAMEA. (Pacific Aircraft Maintenance Engineers Association). These articles may only for used for not-for-profit educational purposes. Copyright © 2020.

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020

    Categories

    All
    Career Development
    Communication
    Delegation
    Evaluations
    Organizational Change
    Partnerships
    Resilience
    Succession Planning

    RSS Feed

Subscribe to Aviation News Journal's e-mail newsletters.
Copyright © 2021 - Low Flying Media Inc.
  • News and Articles
    • Feature Articles
    • News
    • Airshows
    • Aviation Management
    • Airports
    • High Flyer Comics
    • Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact